Barry Kay: Polling is a business; the interest of pollsters is not to educate the public
Story Transcript
Polls and the presidential elections Pt. 3
PAUL JAY, SENIOR EDITOR: Welcome back to our interview with Barry Kay on polling and the coming US elections. Barry, the election campaigns themselves are like Coke and Pepsi advertising campaigns. Itโs a battle of brands. There is in fact more real policy, if one dug into it. You can find Obama and McCain policy positions, and it sometimes gets quite sophisticated. You certainly wouldnโt know it by hearing the election campaigns. Most people donโt know that McCainโs senior foreign policy advisor is Randy Scheunemann, who was a paid lobbyist for Georgia. You have to be a blogger, Internet, sophisticated viewer to know that McCain has such a biased input on the Georgia issue. Most people donโt know that Obamaโsโone of his senior foreign policy consultants, Brzezinski, has called for full spectrum dominance and endorses a plan to assert American power in the Caucasus and the encirclement of Russia. But if you dig into the issues of whatโs really at stake here, people would find a much more urgent need, I think, to know more. Is there any push-back that one can actually see from polling that says people are fed up with the superficiality of elections?
BARRY KAY, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY: Some are. Part of the problem, though, the people that are really committed about issuesโand there are lots of people that are, and maybe there are people that tend to be in the audience, you know, watching this right now that have very strong commitmentsโthose tend not to be sort of the marginal swing voter. Those are people that are committed on the left or on the right and tend to support one side or another. And in a close election, which at the moment this one has all the earmarks of being, in a close election, those people arenโt going to change. So, actually, the marginal voter, the voter thatโs going to swing it from a 50-49, or to the one side or the other, those people are the less-informed voter, the kind of voter that will in fact be influenced by the more superficial issues.
JAY: But is part of the problem the polling itself? Like, if you do a poll with Hillary Clinton and Obama, or now you can do it with Obama and McCain, you know, “change versus experience,” so you do polling based on advertising slogans. But if you did a polling based on “Are you aware that, for example”โeither Iโm talking about Brzezinskiโs plan, or Scheunemann and McCainโ”Are you aware that, for example, Randy Scheunemann was a lobbyist for Georgia and now advises John McCain. Would this affect your vote?” In other words, if you did polling that helped people dig into what the issues are and what they then think about them, wouldnโt that give us quite different results than polling on change versus experience?
KAY: The marginalโagain, it depends on how you sort of see your clientรจle. But if youโre going for 51 percent of the electorate, that isnโt the way to win elections, because the kind of people that are concerned about these issues are people that are not likely to move from one side to the other.
JAY: No, Iโm talking about the responsibility of people doing the polling. Shouldnโt they be asking more real questions?
KAY: Well, that gets into their motivations. And, frankly, a lot of the pollsters are there basically to sell. They donโt make money on these political polls. Theyโre basically trying to get brand recognition so that they can then sell their products to whatever other corporate enterprises there are in the four years between elections. Thatโs not to say they want to get bad results, but the interest of pollsters isnโt primarily to educate the public; itโs to try to provide some sort of barometer of whatโs going on, which hopefully will have [inaudible]
JAY: A barometer within a very narrow narrative. Itโs the horse race as defined through the campaigns.
KAY: Absolutely. But the media are interested in trying to get as many people to watch theirโto consume their media outlet, whether itโs newspapers, electronic, or increasingly now on the Internet. But, yeah, itโs not a particularly edifying process, and thatโs probably disappointing to a lot of people.
JAY: And is there anyone doing any polling that tries to dig in on what people really think about the issues and their own problems, rather than the horse race?
KAY: Yeah, but it varies, and, you know, different people that areโ. That isnโt primarily what pollsters are about. Pollsters are trying to promote their brand name. They want accurate polls so that they can then claim better credit with regard to the commercial work theyโre doing between elections. But, again, Iโm perhaps a little more skeptical about the whole media [inaudible] than you were expressing. It may not be your view.
JAY: No, no. If I wasnโt this skeptical, I wouldnโt be doing The Real News Network.
KAY: But the people who areโyou know, in the media, too, theyโve got an agenda, and their agenda is getting as many people to watch and consume their particular outlet as possible, and thatโs why you get very different kinds within the media. You get Fox News, with a very different kind of potential target audience than CNN or the BBC, and the kind of programming is very different as a result.
JAY: So we wind up polling whatโs essentially a spectator sport about advertising campaigns.
KAY: Thatโs part of the motivation. Frankly, Iโm a political junkie, so I love itโI consume as many polls as I can. I certainly donโt put too much faith on any one poll. But overall, when you sort of, you know, aggregate a bunch together, I think they are saying something thatโs reasonably interesting and reasonably valid.
JAY: In the next segment of our interview, letโs discuss whoโs going to win the 2008 presidential elections. Weโll ask you to look into your polling crystal ball. Please join us for the next segment of our interview with Barry Kay.
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that TRNN transcripts are typed from a recording of the program; The Real News Network cannot guarantee their complete accuracy.



