This interview is why I support TRNN. Both interviewer and interviewee want the truth! - David
Log in and tell us why you support TRNN
Bart Chilton is the current commissioner for the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Chairman of the CFTC's Global Markets Advisory Committee (GMAC). He was nominated by President Bush and confirmed by the U. S. Senate in 2007. In 2009, he was re-nominated by President Obama and reconfirmed by the Senate. He has served as the Chairman of the CFTCâ€™s Energy and Environmental Markets Advisory Committee (EEMAC). His career spans 25 years in government serviceâ€”working on Capitol Hill in the House of Representatives, in the Senate, and serving in the Executive Branch during the Clinton, Bush and Obama Administrations. Prior to joining the CFTC, Mr. Chilton was the Chief of Staff and Vice President for Government Relations at the National Farmers Union where he represented family farmers. In 2005, Mr. Chilton was a Schedule C political appointee of President Bush at the U. S. Farm Credit Administration where he served as an Executive Assistant to the Board. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Chilton was a Senior Advisor to Senator Tom Daschle, the Democrat Leader of the United States Senate, where he worked on myriad issues including agriculture and transportation policy.
PAUL JAY, SENIOR EDITOR, TRNN: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Paul Jay in Washington. During and after the crash in 2008 of the finance sector, which created a global economic crisis, many people were talking about facing the Apocalypse, the global economy going over the cliff. And the lack of regulation was pointed to as the critical factor helping to trigger the crisis. So what followed was a bill called the Dodd-Frank bill that was passed that was supposed to create the mechanism to control and--what was called an out-of-control or casino-capitalism Wall Street. Now joining us to talk about how that act is being enacted and how successful it is proceeding is Bart Chilton, and he's a commissioner with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission here in Washington. Thanks for joining us.BART CHILTON, COMMISSIONER, CFTC: Good to be with you, Paul.JAY: So how's it going? We were told that without regulation this could all happen again. So what's happening that might prevent this from all happening again, if in fact something is happening?CHILTON: Well, you're right that it could happen again without appropriate regulation. The law that was passed by Congress a year ago July makes significant changes. And what it does is it brings the dark markets--these are markets that regulators didn't see at all before. And that's where a lot of this crazy trading took place. People have heard about credit default swaps and bets upon bets upon bets that bundled groups of mortgages would fail. That's sort of a casino mentality. You talk about it in your intro. And that could happen again, because right now, today, we are heretofore not regulating that market. The law allows us to do so, but we've got to put these regulations in place, as you indicated. So I think we're going to have those done by the end of the year, but we're working hard to get them in place, and it's been a real tough struggle, to be honest with you.JAY: A struggle against what? I mean, I understand this is very complex, and just writing these regulations would be complex, but you're not writing these regulations in a vacuum. You're in a real political world. So what are the obstacles, political obstacles, you're facing?CHILTON: Well, we want to make sure we get the regulations correct. These are very complicated markets. I'll give you an idea of the size and scope that we're dealing with. We currently regulate on exchanges like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange roughly $5 trillion in annualized trading--$5 trillion. But this dark market that we're going to regulate is over $600 trillion. So we've got a lot to look at. We're creating all of the mechanisms to regulate that. Ultimately, I think it's going to be--we're going to get things in place that make a difference for consumers, but we've got lots of competing interests out there. You know, there's an old saying in Washington: if you're not part of the solution, there's plenty of money to be made being part of the problem. And that's, I think, at work here now. We meet with folks who--some genuinely want us to get the regulations correct. Some don't want us to get them in place at all. So figuring out what the fine line is there between the guys who want to get it done right and the guys who want to just run the clock out and not have any regulation is a challenge, but we're doing our best.JAY: So let's talk about running the clock out. The idea here is, I suppose, that they're going to keep--they're going to slow you down (they being lobbyists, primarily for people that know how to make money out of the problem), run the clock out until they're into a presidential election, nobody really wants to do anything, and then they hope after a presidential election they're going to have even more ways to slow you down.CHILTON: That's absolutely correct. That's one scenario. The other is that people's memories are short, and if the economy improves, maybe folks won't remember how calamitous this economy has been. I'm amazed at some of the people I hear out even on the presidential trail talking about the evils of government and the horrible regulations. We had no regulations. We--this economic calamity was caused because we didn't have regulations. And, actually, some of these regulations will encourage economic activity, it will create innovation, it will help fuel the economic engine of our democracy. The question for us as regulators is just to get them right, to ensure that they're good for markets, good for the country, and importantly, good for consumers.JAY: Well, is part of the reason there's no longer a sense of urgency is that there is a sense that if it all happens again, it will all happen again, which means there'll be another bailout, because there's no reason why there wouldn't be, 'cause what's changed? If the finance sector goes down the drain again, it's going to have the same consequences.CHILTON: There's a provision in the law, Paul, that says that we will not have another bailout. I mean, this thing was a hideous, you know, hundreds of billions of dollar bailout, and these systemically important institutions--that's why the regulations are so important, that we guard against them going down. And so while they might not like regulators looking over their shoulder, our job is to ensure that they don't go down and to have appropriate sideboards on this crazy casino-like trading that you've talked about to ensure that they are stable.JAY: But they're fighting you tooth and nail.CHILTON: They're fighting us, some more stridently than others.JAY: Let's drill into some of the things you're trying to deal with and let's start with the dark markets. So explain for people that don't know what you mean what do you mean by dark markets.CHILTON: These are things called the over-the-counter markets, OTC markets. And what they are are agreements between two parties to trade a futures-like contract. And when I say a futures-like contract, I'm talking about I will pay you a certain amount for crude oil or silver or soybeans in six months, and you agree to that product. These traits are going on all the time, hundreds and hundreds of trillions of dollars, and they impact the price that consumers pay, from everything from milk to mortgages.JAY: [crosstalk] hedge bets or derivatives bets? Which one are you talking about?CHILTON: These are bets on derivatives that are supposed to be a hedge against a business risk. So if I'm a large commercial dealer, say I'm an airline, I have an interest in how much my energy cost is going to be. I want to hedge that risk for the outcome that maybe fuel prices will be higher. And so I will enter into an agreement that will mitigate my risk. That's what these markets are used for, both the regulated markets and these OTC markets. The problem has been is that the OTC markets so outweigh in size that all of this supply and demand, all of these different equations are taking place over here, they are impacting the regulated markets. And it's the regulated markets that are the price drivers for consumers. And that's what we've got to remember, what impacts consumers.JAY: And the unregulated dark market, a lot of those bets have nothing to do with ever taking delivery. It's just pure bets, it's just pure gambling, right?CHILTON: A lot of folks in these markets are speculators. Now, there's nothing wrong with speculators. If you don't have speculators in markets, quite frankly, you don't have a market. The question is: is there an appropriate role for speculation? And what the law requires is that we guard against excessive speculation. And so we are charged with putting some sort of limit on how much an individual speculator may control of a market, and we're working hard on that. We're supposed to have that rule done in July also. We haven't managed to skin that cat yet, although I've been pushing on it. But hopefully we're going to have that done in the next several months. So, for example, one trader can't have 20, 30 percent of the crude oil market or of the silver market [crosstalk] JAY: This is what they're calling position limits?CHILTON: That's correct, yes. And we've seen these high percentages in markets in the last several years. And it can definitely contort prices and, again, impact consumers.JAY: Now, we talked off camera, but let me ask you on camera. Part of this excessive trading, you divide it into two categories. You had massive passives and what you called cheetahs. Explain what that is and how it's affecting the markets, and then people's, as you say, said, milk and oil.CHILTON: Well, in general these markets have worked very well over the years. There wasn't any large company that went under in 2007 or 2008 because of their futures position on the regulated exchanges. It's this OTC dark market that was a problem, with credit default swaps and these bets upon bets. So for us the job is to put some sort of limits in place that guard against the excessive speculation. And there's two areas, one, as you say, the massive passives. This is a new investment class of trader. These folks shifted from the equities, from securities and stocks, they went into the futures markets, and they are betting, say, crude oil will be more not in the next couple of weeks, not at the end of the summer driving season, but maybe in 2013 or 2050. And these are massive funds--pension funds, exchange-traded funds, hedge funds--massive--and they're fairly price insensitive, because while they may not like the price of oil going down today or tomorrow or next week, their real bet is much longer-term. That's a different type of speculator in the market. Usually speculators are in and out of the market based upon sophisticated trading information.JAY: Well, before we go to the second group, this first group that's betting, say, that, for the sake of argument, aluminum in 2013 is going to be worth this much, and they're going to buy this long-term hedge on that, is part of the problem that we know that companies like Glencore and Goldman Sachs are buying massive warehouses and they're storing, hoarding aluminum, so you get, you know, a very self-fulfilling bet, because you can manipulate the market? And so how much is that happening, and is there anything that can be done about it by your commission?CHILTON: We can do something about that type of circumstance, the theoretical circumstance that you raise. A matter of fact, we had a case earlier this year. A company called Arcadia we believe tried to do that. And not that we just believe it; we're prosecuting them for that.JAY: And this is important to point out. This is the first prosecution in how long?CHILTON: We've only had one successful prosecution of manipulation in 35 years. We prosecuted other times, but--and sometimes we come up with a settlement or some favorable outcome, but we've only successfully prosecuted one. So this Arcadia thing is a big deal, in that we think that they manipulated the physical market and made money between the physical market and the futures market. And so this is something we need to watch out for all the time. JAY: Explain how it works.CHILTON: How it worked in Arcadia is they bought long futures--so they bet that the price of crude oil was going to go up. Then they bought a lot of the physical market, therefore decreasing the supply and driving prices up. And they made money when prices went up. Then they dumped the--they bought short positions in crude oil, dumped the physical, and made money when the price went down. And they did this several times. And as a result, we're prosecuting them.JAY: And I don't know if you can put a number on it, but is this something that you think is going on a lot?CHILTON: I think it happens more than folks realize. I think that we need to do a better job as an agency of looking at that physical holding, along with the futures positions. I think for too long we've sort of been bureaucrats and said, it's not our job, and had blinders on. If we're not looking at the physical in combine with their futures position, I don't think we're doing our job adequately to protect consumers.JAY: If I understand it correctly, you have 600 people working for you.CHILTON: Yeah.JAY: When you--the size of the dark economy that you're going to bring in and regulate is how much?CHILTON: It's something like one per trillion. Yeah. It's $600 trillion. It may be a little bit less than that. The Securities and Exchange Commission will get some of those. But we're going to have hundreds of trillions of dollars of trading to oversee, Paul [crosstalk] JAY: How many people--to really fulfill your legal obligation under Dodd-Frank, how many people do you think you need?CHILTON: Roughly 1,000 people when we get up and running is what we need. But, you know, the people that voted against this Dodd-Frank Law, the law to put sideboards on this regulation, some of those very same people are trying to de-fund us on Capitol Hill so we won't be able to do the job that actually Congress told us to do. So that's a big concern of mine. You know, it's one thing for us to put the regulations in place, but if we don't have the people power and the technology to back it up, it's really just words on a page.JAY: So how dangerous a moment are we in, then, if in fact this unregulated sector helped trigger this global collapse?CHILTON: We're at a hair-trigger point where, if we can go one way or another, we can sort of go along and potentially have economic calamities, or we can step up to the plate and look at this market in a way that Congress has told us to do and [which] we know caused problems for the economy. We're still digging our way out of these problems and the massive, hideous bailout that we had. So it's really--we're at a hair trigger on which way we go now, and it's really going to depend on funding, I think. So, you know, in Washington everybody always wants more money, and, you know, we've got to be cautious about that, but in this instance we are looking at preventing fraud, abuse, manipulation that impacts the price that people pay for just about everything they purchase. I think that's a pretty important priority for the nation.JAY: Okay. In the next segment of our interview, let's drill into a little more of what has caused the rise in the price of oil and the price of food. Please join us for the next segment of our interview with Bart Chilton on The Real News Network.
End of Transcript
DISCLAIMER: Please note that transcripts for The Real News Network are typed from a recording of the program. TRNN cannot guarantee their complete accuracy.
Our automatic spam filter blocks comments with multiple links and multiple users using the same IP address.
Please make thoughtful comments with minimal links using only one user name.
If you think your comment has been mistakenly removed please email us at email@example.com