NO ADVERTISING, GOVERNMENT OR CORPORATE FUNDING
DONATE TODAY
Incest-porn.me many-vids.net HOT TOPICS ▶ Climate Change     Undoing The New Deal     The Real Baltimore     Reality Asserts Itself     United Kingdom    


  January 17, 2018

Congressional Candidates Pledge to Move Off Fossil Fuels


More than 100 House and Senate candidates around the country are pledging to support the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act if they are elected, says Mark Schlosberg of Food & Water Action
Members don't see ads. If you are a member, and you're seeing this appeal, click here
   


audio

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter



Because news is only as honest as the intentions of those who report it. - Joel L.
Log in and tell us why you support TRNN


biography

Mark Schlosberg is Organizing co-director for Food & Water Watch and Food & Water Action. Food & Water Watch was the first national environmental organization to call for a ban on fracking and works with community groups across the country for clean water, safe food, and a livable climate.


transcript

GREGORY WILPERT: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Gregory Wilpert coming to you from Quito, Ecuador. The United States experienced one of the worst years of climate and weather disasters in 2017. With damages exceeding 306 billion dollars according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Still, in January the US has all ready broken many temperature records and experienced extreme and dangerous weather. All of this has been linked to human caused climate change.

While president Trump, a climate change denier runs the country, can anything be done to combat the catastrophic climate change on a federal level? Many are now looking to the 2018 congressional elections coming up in November. And it appears more than 100 US house and senate candidates around the country are campaigning on a platform to combat climate change and pledging support of the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act if they're elected. With us to discuss this, we are joined from Oakland, California by Mark Schlosberg, the National Organizing Director of Food and Water Watch. Welcome to The Real News Network, Mark.

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Hey, thanks for having me.

GREGORY WILPERT: So, first of all Mark, tell us about the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act, or OFF Act. What would it mean if it was passed?

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Well, the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act, or the OFF Act was introduced by representative Tulsi Gabbard last fall. It's the strongest, most aggressive piece of climate legislation that's been introduced in Congress and it sets a requirement of 100% renewable energy, clean renewable energy by 2035. And importantly, recognizing the next 10 years being absolutely critical, sets an interim 80% benchmark by 2027. It also places a moratorium on new federal fossil fuel projects. It eliminates subsidies for the oil and gas industry. It creates a fund for a just transition. It eliminates exports of oil and gas and also says that our transportation system needs to move to 100% renewable energy. So, it's really very aggressive, very ambitious, but also what’s absolutely required by the science that is increasingly showing the urgency of us acting on climate change now.

We don't have time to wait until 2050, 2080 or beyond. We need to act now in the next 10 years. The science tells us is really quite critical.

GREGORY WILPERT: So, there are more than 100 congressional candidates who have pledged to support the bill, and if elected they're predominantly in blue states, or democratic based states. Is there also support among republicans for this bill?

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Well, the bill right now has 23 cosponsors in the house in addition to Congresswoman Gabbard all of whom are Democrats. We have seen as you mentioned, over 100 congressional candidates from 27 states across the country pledging to support this bill if they're elected. And we're also seeing, really a groundswell of support for both this legislation and the concept of moving very quickly and aggressively to 100% renewable energy. So, we're gonna see this be an issue in the elections as they move forward, but it's also an issue that's moving forward at the state level and at the local level. So, there's several bills that are introduced in various states across the country, that are going to be introduced in various states across the country, and there's many cities across the country that have passed measures saying that we need to be at 100% renewable by 2035 at the latest. Really, we need to start acting now, the next 10 years being critical.

GREGORY WILPERT: So, as supporting renewable energy instead of fossil fuel has become such a partisan issue, are there any Republican politicians such as governors for example who are actually supporting renewable energy because it also creates more jobs than the fossil fuel industry?

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Well, it's interesting you mention about it being a partisan issue because we know from polling that people across all political lines would like to see action taken to stop the effects of climate change, even though majority of or large percentage of Republicans don't believe in climate change. The science is very clear. We need to have strong action now. In terms of Republican elected officials, we've seen some taking on things such as a carbon tax, but we know that measures like that are not sufficient to address this problem. They're not effective as born out by evidence of where we've seen that type of thing enacted. And we need elected officials who are both Democrats and Republicans to push for strong regulatory approaches that are actually going to address the problem.

This debate between a regulatory approach to move as quickly to 100% renewable energy and market mechanisms that tinker with the market to try and create incentives to go away from fossil fuels is very significant, something that's really happening right now. And when we decided we wanted to clean up our water and pass the Clean Water Act, we didn't say, “How can we create a tax system so that people will not pollute our water? “We just regulated and said, “You can't do that pollution.” We need to do the same thing with our move to renewable energy and it needs to be done in a very aggressive timeline because the science really shows that we just don't have time to wait.

GREGORY WILPERT: You mentioned earlier also, that there are several states that are introducing bills on a state level in the coming weeks. Can you tell us a little bit more about these state laws?

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Yeah. So, we're seeing real groundswell of support for really bold action on climate, particularly 100% renewable energy by 2030, in some cases by 2035. No later than 2035. New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Maryland, Colorado and elsewhere are really looking towards moving these really strong and bold measures. So, we're really excited to be working on those measures. There's lots of other activity happening at the local level. The Council of Mayors recommended last year, moving by 2035 and it's got to also be done right. It needs to be done in a way that's clean, that doesn't include unclean sources as renewable energy.

It's got to really be wind, solar, some geothermal, and existing hydro and ways to get us to 100% renewable. And we know we can do it. This is not a matter of whether something is technologically feasible. We know it is. It's really a measure of political will. And we've got to have the will to do it.

GREGORY WILPERT So, beyond the obvious benefit of getting off of polluting fossil fuels that we also know are driving climate change and are leading to more intense national disasters. Are there any other economic benefits of shifting to more renewables for the United States?

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Absolutely. Shifting to renewables and really investing in renewable energy will create jobs all across the country. It will help build a burgeoning renewable energy industry. And it'll really put us at the forefront in terms of creating jobs, and Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act creates a fund and a center for dispersing these funds, and for making these investments in a way that makes sure that the bill is benefiting the most vulnerable communities. Low end communities, communities of color and those who are most impacted by climate change and the transition. So, it really is very thoughtful about making sure that as we're moving to 100% renewable, we're building our economy and we’re building our economy in a just and equitable way.

GREGORY WILPERT: Finally, given the recent slew of disasters, do you get a sense that the American public is readier to connect the dots as it were between fossil fuel use and climate change related disasters than they have been in the past, and therefore willing to support the candidates who are supporting the OFF Act?

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Absolutely. I mean, we've seen this last year, if anybody was wondering whether this is an urgent issue that needs to be addressed now. In your lead in, you mentioned the 300 billion dollar price tag, Put that price tag pales in comparison to the human cost of what's happened with Puerto Rico, with the hurricanes that hit Houston and Florida. With the fires that have ravaged the west. There's just been an overwhelming, and that's just been the United States, not even talking about the overwhelming impact of what happened, have happened in Africa and Asia, and elsewhere. So, this is a very real humanitarian problem. It's an economic problem and I think people are seeing that this is something that we really need to address.

The polling's starting to bear that out with more and more people wanting to support bold action on climate. Candidates are seeing this and they're reacting by pledging to support things like the Off Fossil Fuel Act. That's why here at Food and Water Action, we think it's really important to continue to push this at the state level and at the local level as we try and move things federally. I should note that if Democrats take control of Congress, they're going to be in a position to move a piece of legislation. It may not be signed by the president but they'll be able to move and begin to advance an agenda. And we really have a very short period of time where we need to make really bold change.

We need to do this in the next, really, four, five years. We need to pass something significant at the federal level and we need to pass these state bills in the next couple of years. Because we need to actually start reducing our emissions, making that transition because the science tells us we just don't have that much time.

GREGORY WILPERT: So, here at The Real News we're constantly following climate stories and will continue to follow this development around this bill. I'm speaking to Mark Schlosberg the National Organizing Director of Food and Water Action. Thanks again, Mark for having joined us today.

MARK SCHLOSBERG: Thank you.

GREGORY WILPERT: And thank you for joining The Real News Network.



Comments

Our automatic spam filter blocks comments with multiple links and multiple users using the same IP address. Please make thoughtful comments with minimal links using only one user name. If you think your comment has been mistakenly removed please email us at contact@therealnews.com

latest stories

The Return Berlusconi: Can A Fractured Left Defeat Him?
Potomac Pipeline Would Be 'Another Contradiction' From Larry Hogan
Police Union Keeps Audit Secret Despite Allegations of Massive Overtime Fraud
Guns, Toxic Masculinity, and the Alt-Right
Zuma's Catastrophic Presidency Ends in Forced Resignation
Brother of Crooked Cop Says He Knows Who Killed Detective Suiter
Israeli Strikes in Egypt Kept Secret for Years
As the Opioid Crisis Deepens, Will Maryland Democrats Vote to Save Lives?
The Free Market Threat to Democracy
Finding a SALT Tax Deduction Workaround
Leader of Neo-Nazi Militia Says MAGA Hat-Wearing Florida Shooter Trained with Them
Charter School Principal: No Evidence Privatization Is Better For Students
Max Blumenthal in Gaza: Netanyahu Faces Scandal, Palestinians a Crisis
Trump's Infrastructure Fantasy a Gift to His Donors
Netanyahu Could Fall for Corruption, Not War Crimes
Climate Change Costs Insurance Companies Billions, And Price is Rising
Trump's Budget Declares War on Forgotten America
West Virginia Woman Removed From Legislature After Exposing Fossil Fuel Contributions to Lawmakers
Leftist Hopeful's Lead Signals Upheaval for Mexico
Wilkerson: From Trump Parade to Budget, There's 'Too Much Military'
Trump's Budget and Infrastructure Plans Threaten Environment
Catharsis and Corruption in Wake of Dirty Cop Conviction
Confronting Trudeau on Climate Lies and Kinder Morgan Pipeline
Two Cops Found Guilty In Massive Police Corruption Scandal
In First Black Police Chief's Appeal, Judges Weigh Prosecutorial Misconduct, Discrimination
City Council Committee Advances Styrofoam Ban, But Delays Implementation
Trump Privatizes America
Is the Oil Industry Canada's 'Deep State'?
FBI Says It Has No Records on Violent Neo-Nazi Group, While Surveilling Antifascists and Black Activists
Democracy in Crisis: The FBI and Dirty Cops

TheRealNewsNetwork.com, RealNewsNetwork.com, The Real News Network, Real News Network, The Real News, Real News, Real News For Real People, IWT are trademarks and service marks of Independent World Television inc. "The Real News" is the flagship show of IWT and The Real News Network.

All original content on this site is copyright of The Real News Network. Click here for more

Problems with this site? Please let us know

Web Design, Web Development and Managed Hosting