NO ADVERTISING, GOVERNMENT OR CORPORATE FUNDING

  • Latest News
  • Pitch a Story
  • Work with a Journalist
  • Join the Blog Squad
  • Afghanistan
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Baltimore
  • Canada
  • Egypt
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Russia
  • Economy
  • Environment
  • Health Care
  • Military
  • Occupy
  • Organize This
  • Reality Asserts Itself
  • US Politics
  • 50 Years Later, the War on Poverty Working Better Than the Right or Left Will Admit Pt. 1


    Annelise Orleck: Though the War on Poverty failed to address the structural reasons poverty is so widespread in America, it did bring about badly needed changes including addressing childhood poverty,expanding the social safety net and empowering low income communities of color -   January 13, 2014
    Members don't see ads. If you are a member, and you're seeing this appeal, click here


    Audio

    Share to Facebook Share to Twitter



    No sports, no celebrities, no paid stories, no agendas. Pure integrity. - Steve Dustcircle
    Log in and tell us why you support TRNN

    Bio

    Annelise Orleck is Professor of History at Dartmouth College. She is the author of Storming Caesars Palace: How Black Mothers Fought Their Own War on Poverty (Beacon: 2005)  and co-editor of The War on Poverty: A New Grassroots History (University of Georgia Press, 2011.) She is also the author of Common Sense and A Little Fire: Women and Working Class Politics in the United States (1995).

    Transcript

    50 Years Later, the War on Poverty Working Better Than the Right or Left 
Will Admit Pt. 1JAISAL NOOR, TRNN PRODUCER: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Jaisal Noor in Baltimore.

    We're continuing our coverage of the 50th anniversary of the launching of the War on Poverty by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The War on Poverty was comprised of a series of federal laws that provided food aid, health care, employment opportunities through the creations of programs like Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, and the Economic Opportunity Act.

    Now joining us to discuss this is Annelise Orleck. She's a professor of history at Dartmouth College, author of Storming Caesar's Palace: How Black Mothers Fought Their Own War on Poverty, and coeditor of The War on Poverty: A New Grassroots History.

    Thank you so much for joining us.

    ANNELISE ORLECK, PROF. HISTORY, DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: Thanks for having me.

    NOOR: So, let's start off by taking a look at how the War on Poverty is being remembered today. On one hand, you have Republicans taking to the airwaves, saying that the War on Poverty is a miserable failure because more people are in poverty today than were 50 years ago. On the other hand, Democrats from President Obama to Bill Clinton have distanced themselves from the policies launched 50 years ago. And they've also gone through efforts such as privatizing these same policies. What is your response?

    ORLECK: Well, my response is that the War on Poverty succeeded to a greater degree, perhaps, than anyone ever talks about and to a greater degree than many politicians wanted it to. And I mean that in two senses.

    It succeeded in cutting poverty. Did it eradicate it entirely? No, but that was perhaps a bit of bombast on Johnson's part. It was not likely they were going to, quote-unquote, end poverty "in our time." Nevertheless, in ten years they cut child poverty in half. And overall, the poverty rates in the country have not approached what they were prior to the enactment of the Economic Opportunity Act in 1964. So in terms of its impacts on poverty, it was significant.

    But there's a second way in which I think it was a great success, and that is that it expanded the political class. It allowed poor people into the political process and allowed them to serve on school boards, housing boards, to run for office and city council, state legislatures, and even, you know, to Congress and some higher-up federal jobs. So in all of those ways I think it was a success.

    It also delivered really necessary and vital services to poor communities across the country, including medical care, housing, food aid, opened libraries, opened community centers, even (in the analysis of some health care scholars) extended the life span in certain poor communities.

    So in all of those ways I am one of the rare people who says the War on Poverty was a pretty big success.

    NOOR: And you mentioned--you touched upon this, and we've talked about it with Glen Ford in a previous interview, but the War on Poverty was also a result of the mobilization of poor people across this country. Can you talk about that? 'Cause that is also another aspect of this that is absent from the mainstream discussion.

    ORLECK: Yeah. The War on Poverty was in many ways an outgrowth of the civil rights movement. And when Lyndon Johnson introduced it, he said political rights are important, but, in his words, "freedom is not enough." You can't be a full participant in our society if you are hungry, if you're sick, if you are ill-clothed. And so, in order to fulfill the promises of the Great Society and of the civil rights movement, he began to enact the legislation of the Great Society.

    And there's no question that one of the most controversial things about it is that in giving federal funds directly to community organizations, in many ways it continued the social unrest of the civil rights era, often moving it to northern cities. And that was something that made the War on Poverty enemies in the Democratic Party, especially among mayors and governors and city council leaders, as well as in the Republican Party.

    All that said, despite the attacks by conservatives, despite Democrats distancing themselves from these programs, the reality is different from the rhetoric. The reality is that most of the War on Poverty programs are still on the books. They've been cut, they've been changed, but no one has been able to get away with them. And indeed some of the biggest expansions have come from Republican presidents, Ronald Reagan extending the earned income tax credit in the mid '80s, George Bush expanding the Food Stamp Program in the 21st century.

    NOOR: And what's behind the attacks on these programs?

    ORLECK: Well, I think that that's complicated. To some extent it's a backlash against the civil rights movement. It's coded racial attacks. It's built on this notion that black people are asking for things that they don't deserve. A perfect example of that relatively recently was after Hurricane Katrina, George Will published a column called "River of Liberal Banalities Overflowing", in which he suggested that the big problem in New Orleans was not that the federal government didn't care enough about the poor, as then senator Barack Obama had suggested, but that black girls needed to stay in school and stop having babies before they were married. So I think there's a racial undertone. There's no question to that.

    I think also attacking the War on Poverty has been an important part of the conservative resurgence. It's tapped into all kinds of fears and resentments, ideas that, you know, somebody's getting something for nothing, and it has attracted votes in that way. And I think we also see very early on in 1964 Ronald Reagan already making some of the arguments you see now from the Tea Party about how the War on Poverty was expanding government in ways that, you know, limited people's freedom.

    So the themes in this attack have been there all along, and I think they've been central to the resurgence of conservative politics on the national level.

    NOOR: And so Republicans note that there's more people in poverty today than there were 50 years ago. What's your response to that statement specifically?

    ORLECK: Well, there's more people numerically. But that's because there's many more people. The percentages of the American population, the percentage of people living in poverty, especially the percentage of children living in poverty, has gone down steadily from--it was dramatically reduced during the years when Johnson's War on Poverty was most robust. There has been a correlation between cuts in poverty programs on the federal level and increases in poverty rates.

    Now, there's no question that it's up higher now than it has been in a very long time, and part of that, a big part of that is the aftermath of the 2008 recession, the jobless recovery. All of that matters. And the increasingly skewed distribution of wealth, changes in the tax code, cuts to tax rates at the very top of the scale, all of those things have contributed to poverty today.

    But it is simply not true that--I mean, it's a sleight of hand. Yes, there are more people who are poor, but the percentages are still lower than they were before the Economic Opportunity Act.

    NOOR: Okay. Well, that wraps up part one of our discussion. We're going to continue this in part two and talk about what some solutions would look like today, and we'll take a look at what poor people were proposing 50 years ago in their own war on poverty.

    Thank you so much for joining us.

    ORLECK: Thank you.

    NOOR: You can follow us @therealnews on Twitter, Tweet me questions and comments @jaisalnoor.

    Thank you so much for joining us.

    End

    DISCLAIMER: Please note that transcripts for The Real News Network are typed from a recording of the program. TRNN cannot guarantee their complete accuracy.


    Comments

    Our automatic spam filter blocks comments with multiple links and multiple users using the same IP address. Please make thoughtful comments with minimal links using only one user name. If you think your comment has been mistakenly removed please email us at contact@therealnews.com

    Comments


    Latest Stories


    Sen. Sanders Presents $1 Trillion Infrastructure Bill as Job Creator
    At the Center of a Storm - Irvin Jim on RAI (2/3)
    The Confirmation Hearings of US Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch
    As Obama Expands Offshore Drilling, a Look at the Health of the Oceans Today
    Death Toll in Ukraine Over 5000 as the Ceasefire Breaks Down (2/2)
    At the Center of a Storm - Irvin Jim, General Secretary of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa on RAI (1/3)
    Marxist Economists, Academics and Philosophers Sworn In to the Greek Cabinet
    Some in GOP See Economic Gain In Immigration Reforms
    Death Toll in Ukraine Over 5000 as the Ceasefire Breaks Down
    US-India Nuke Deal A Big Win for Corporations
    Will the Kurdish Coalition Hold Kobani?
    US Resumes Drone Strikes in Yemen Despite Political Leadership Vacuum
    CIA Whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling Convicted of Espionage
    New Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras Sworn In to Office
    President Obama in Saudi Arabia to Pay Respects to Former Friend and Ally King Abdullah
    Historic Victory for SYRIZA Greece
    Now in Power, SYRIZA Faces Herculean Task
    American Sniper: Honoring a Fallen Hero or Whitewashing a Murderous Occupation?
    Holder's Move on Civil Forfeiture Only a Dent in Abusive Police Practice
    TRNN Replay: Saudi Arabia and the al-Qaeda Monster (3/5)
    McCain Calls 'Cold Warriors' to School Senate on National Security
    The Saudis - Oil, ISIS and Revolution
    Republican Abortion Ban Could Put Pregnant Women's Lives in Peril
    GOP Leadership's Invitation to Netanyahu a Provocation Aimed at War with Iran
    'We are going to destroy the Greek oligarchy system'
    TRNN Replay: What are the Saudis Afraid Of? - Madawi Al-Rasheed (2/5)
    Greek Right Fears First Left Government in Greek History
    Pre-Election Posturing Behind Netanyahu's DC Visit
    SYRIZA Heads Towards a Majority in Greece as Elections Approach
    How Obama Can Reduce Carbon Emissions Without Congress

    RealNewsNetwork.com, Real News Network, Real News, Real News For Real People, IWT are trademarks and service marks of IWT.TV inc. "The Real News" is the flagship show of IWT and Real News Network.

    All original content on this site is copyright of The Real News Network.  Click here for more

    Problems with this site? Please let us know

    Linux VPS Hosting by Star Dot Hosting