NO ADVERTISING, GOVERNMENT OR CORPORATE FUNDING

  • Latest News
  • Pitch a Story
  • Work with a Journalist
  • Join the Blog Squad
  • Afghanistan
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Baltimore
  • Canada
  • Egypt
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Russia
  • Economy
  • Environment
  • Health Care
  • Military
  • Occupy
  • Organize This
  • Reality Asserts Itself
  • US Politics
  • Preliminary Deal Reached for New Major Tar Sands Pipeline in Western Canada


    Yves Engler: Opposition likely to grow against a new tar sands pipeline between British Columbia and Alberta -   October 3, 14
    Members don't see ads. If you are a member, and you're seeing this appeal, click here


    Audio

    Share to Facebook Share to Twitter



    Supporting TRNN is a little like having my own television station. I can watch whatever I find interesting and at any time. I also enjoy the privilege of publishing my opinions on Disqus. - Gregory
    Log in and tell us why you support TRNN

    Bio

    Yves Engler is a Canadian commentator and author. His most recent book is The Ugly Canadian - Stephen Harper's Foreign Policy, and previously he published The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy and Canada in Haiti: Waging War on The Poor Majority

    Transcript

    Preliminary Deal Reached for New Major Tar Sands Pipeline in Western 
CanadaJAISAL NOOR, TRNN PRODUCER: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Jaisal Noor in Baltimore.

    The two Canadian western provinces of Alberta and British Columbia have struck a deal to create a pipeline to get tar sands oil to Canada's west coast. The issue of tar sands has been hotly contested across the country and has been opposed by Canada's First Nations communities, as well as environmental groups.

    Now joining us to discuss this is Yves Engler. He's a Canadian commentator and author. His most recent book is The Ugly Canadian: Stephen Harper's Foreign Policy. And previously he published The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy.

    Thank you so much for joining us.

    YVES ENGLER, AUTHOR AND POLITICAL ACTIVIST, MONTREAL: Thanks for having me.

    NOOR: So, was this a shocker, this deal? Some are saying this is a huge about-face on the part of the British Columbia premier, Christy Clark, that she was saying one thing before she was elected, and now she's betrayed her campaign promises.

    ENGLER: Yeah, I think it's a betrayal, but it's not a particularly big surprise, because she received--her party received lots of money from oil interests during the election and she was seen as the more--for those, you know, who paid close attention, seen as the more pro-oil politician.

    But the agreement, which, you know, has five different parts of broad parts with regards to ecological issues and First Nations and having the province of B.C. get some compensation, all of it's left very vague. It probably doesn't matter, because at the end of the day it's going to be opposition from First Nations in B.C. that is probably going to scuttle/block this pipeline that the Harper government and the premier of Alberta desperately want.

    NOOR: So it's been reported that the value of the exports would be around $17 billion per year. And also it's been reported that just like in the eastern pipeline, this is all going to be about exporting the tar sands oil.

    ENGLER: For sure. This is about building a pipeline that will handle more than 520,000 barrels a day of oil from the tar sands region from around Edmonton to the Pacific coast of B.C. and sort of the northern B.C. or mid range B.C. Kitimat, and to export that oil to--presumably mostly to China. And, you know, it's a huge amount of money. When the price of oil is as high as it is, it's a huge amount of money in terms of profits for the tar sands interests right now. Tar sands oil is selling at lower than the international market price because they have so much difficulty getting the product to, you know, open seas and to the international markets. So they're losing $15, $20 a barrel, there's a discount of $15 to $20 a barrel on tar sands oil right now. So it's a huge amount of money that the companies want. And it's--you know, from a Canadian nationalist perspective, all of the refining jobs and all that stuff is lost to elsewhere.

    And, obviously, the biggest question, the question of the expansion of the tar sands and the expansion of the greenhouse gas emissions, the plan--International Energy Agency's saying that they're expecting 5.7 million barrels a day of Canadian oil being produced by 2030, most of that coming from the tar sands, most of that being heavy carbon emitting from the in situ production, which is even more carbon-emitting than the traditional production of tar sands. And, you know, this is--from a standpoint for humanity's ability to live on this planet, this does not bode well for the future. But there is some significant money to be made, so the corporate interests are pushing hard.

    NOOR: So it's probably worth emphasizing that this is one of the dirtiest ways to extract energy on the entire planet, essentially, burning tar sands oil. And so this deal has just been agreed upon. Do you believe it's possible this can be derailed at some point in the future? Or do you think this is definitely going to go through?

    ENGLER: Oh, I think that it's still most likely to be derailed. I think that the agreement--ostensibly, the agreement between Alberta and B.C. actually means nothing legally, because this is federal government jurisdiction. So the Harper government is--after the review process, which is supposed to culminate, actually, this month, by the end of the--before the end of the year, there's an ongoing review process that needs to say whether they support the building of the pipeline. And that is expected to--this review process is expected to probably say yes, considering what we've sort of seen so far, even though over 95 percent of submissions to the review process were critical of the pipeline. But it's expected to say yes with a whole bunch of conditions. Then the federal government has to say yes or no. It's clear the federal government will be saying yes if the review process says yes.

    But then there's the question of unceded land. British Columbia First Nations--this is unceded land, so they have rights. And they have shown very clearly, they've shown very strongly and repeatedly--most of the First Nations in B.C. are not supportive of this project. They don't want this to go through their lands. They've said they'll pursue it--opposition in court, where they'll try to get the courts to oppose this. And if the courts won't oppose it and they won't recognize their treaty rights--or not the treaty rights, but their inherent right to their lands that hasn't been ceded, then they will oppose it through civil disobedience means and other means. So I would still venture to guess that the Northern Gateway Pipelines will not be successful. The majority of people in British Columbia, polls show very clearly, are opposed to the project.

    So this is a battle that's going to go on for years and years. It's to be determined which way it goes.

    NOOR: Thank you so much for joining us.

    ENGLER: Thanks for having me.

    NOOR: You can follow us @therealnews on Twitter, Tweet me questions, story ideas, and read my questions to our viewers @jaisalnoor on Twitter.

    Thank you so much for joining us.

    End

    DISCLAIMER: Please note that transcripts for The Real News Network are typed from a recording of the program. TRNN cannot guarantee their complete accuracy.


    Comments

    Our automatic spam filter blocks comments with multiple links and multiple users using the same IP address. Please make thoughtful comments with minimal links using only one user name. If you think your comment has been mistakenly removed please email us at contact@therealnews.com

    Comments


    Latest Stories


    X: Malcolm's Final Years
    Baltimore's Harbor-Front Development at the Expense of City Infrastructure and Schools
    Walmart Minimum Wage Hike to $10 Still Below 1968 Levels
    Winter in the Ruins of Gaza (2/2)
    Clinton Dynasty Revisited
    How Progressive Agendas Came to Dominate Chicago Alderman Races
    Public Policy and Blaming Poor Black Communities For Their Own Poverty
    Winter in the Ruins of Gaza (1/2)
    Netanyahu on a Destructive Path
    HSBC Offshore Tax-Evading Scandal Widening
    The Class That Ruled Egypt Under Mubarak Remains in Power
    Nurses Unite to Stop TPP Fast Track
    Is FCC Approval of Net Neutrality a Real Win for Consumers?
    What Happened to Making Steel in Baltimore? - Mark Reutter on Reality Asserts Itself (3/3)
    Nader: Canadian Anti-Terrorism Bill Follows America's Lead
    Why the $655 Million Verdict Against the PA is Not A Victory for Human Rights
    Unions Fight Controversial Charter School Expansion Bill
    Venezuelan Gov. Releases Audio of Coup Plotters
    The Greek Debt and the German Acquiescence
    Maryland Police Reform Advocates and Opponents Speak Out Prior to Hearing
    Baltimore College Fights To Keep Accreditation Status
    An Irish-Style Banking Inquiry into the 2008 Financial Crisis
    What Role Can Social Media Play in Supporting Protests Against Egypt's Military Regime?
    Greece Now Positioned to Negotiate a New Loan Agreement
    Chicago Mayor Emmanuel Forced Into Historic Runoff
    Guardian UK Exposes Horrific Abuses at Police 'Black Sites'
    Greek Reform Proposal Preserves Privatization Commitments, Ignores Debt Restructuring
    The Modern History of the Greek Debt Crisis
    Iran's Intent is the Real Issue, Says Former IAEA Inspector
    Bill O'Reilly May Have Covered-Up a Massacre

    RealNewsNetwork.com, Real News Network, Real News, Real News For Real People, IWT are trademarks and service marks of IWT.TV inc. "The Real News" is the flagship show of IWT and Real News Network.

    All original content on this site is copyright of The Real News Network.  Click here for more

    Problems with this site? Please let us know

    Linux VPS Hosting by Star Dot Hosting